There has been widespread media coverage of the recently terminated parking eye lawsuit. This case which pitted this private parking company against Mr. Barry Beavis caught the attention of all interested parties, particularly the major players in this given industry. For quite a long time, these business establishments were at a loss of what to do when it came to the enforcement of commercial parking regulations. Fortunately, the successful termination of this lawsuit has essentially set to rest the doubts that may have been entertained about this matter. At the same time, this case has been noted for bringing to the fore several important issues.
To begin with, the general public is now well aware of just how penalties against non-compliant clients should be managed. Together with the exact manner in which these business establishments ought to store and make use of the private data they collect while managing their client’s car parks. Additionally, the main question that was on everybody’s mind has also been put to rest. This is the legal right these firms have to impose penalties on non-conforming customers.
What were the exact particulars of the parking eye vs. Beavis lawsuit?
Should you have missed out on the developments of this landmark lawsuit, this is the gist of it. Parking eye, in the month of April 2013, sent a charge letter to Mr. Barry Beavis who resides in Chelmsford to the amount of eighty-five pounds. This was as a result of this gentleman overstaying the 2 hour parking limit, which was in force in a local retail parking lot. Mr. Beavis didn’t take it laying down, and he immediately made a petition to the UK supreme court in an attempt to overturn this charge letter. The case seemed to drag on for more two years, before the supreme court ultimately issued a verdict which confirmed the legal prerogative of this parking management company to take the step it did. In a statement that the highest court in the UK released, it unequivocally attested that the charge was indeed lawful, and more to the point reasonable.
What can be expected from this iconic supreme court ruling?
This landmark ruling will definitely carry serious repercussions in this given industry. More so when you take into account the clear confirmation that these business establishments have the legal mandate to slap punitive penalties on those clients that may breach the various articles of the parking agreements they consented to. This basically connotes that customers who in any way breach these guidelines will have to face the penalties, which are imposed on them at the discretion of parking management firms.
Quite naturally, this parking eye vs. Beavis lawsuit is also anticipated to greatly change the public perception on the feasibility of these measures. This in its turn will heighten overall compliance to these private parking rules. Which apart from going a long way in enhancing the security of car parks, will also go on to trigger a significant reduction of these overstaying incidences. As all business organization readily appreciate, this state of affairs can be very detrimental to trade, and should, therefore, welcome these measures wholeheartedly. , Please follow this link http://absolutecarparking.co.uk/project/parking-eye-news/ to find out more about the lawsuit.
You can also visit http://absolutecarparking.co.uk to find out about the difference car park management services available to assist you in running your car park